0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¹³» °£È£ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ±³À° Æò°¡µµ±¸ °³¹ß¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂû

Review for Development of Nursing Simulation Education Evaluation Instruments

Çѱ¹°£È£½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÇÐȸÁö 2022³â 10±Ç 2È£ p.47 ~ 63
KMID : 1149420220100020047
Â÷Áö¿µ ( Cha Ji-Young ) - Catholic University Graduate School

±èµµ¿¬ ( Kim Do-Yeon ) - Catholic University Graduate School
¹Ú¼Ò¿µ ( Park So-Young ) - Catholic University Graduate School Department of Nursing

Abstract

Purpose: This study reviews trends in the development of nursing simulation evaluation instruments and their characteristics in South Korea.

Methods: Published and unpublished studies were analyzed using Korean electronic databases, such as the Research Information Sharing Service, the National Library of Korea, and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. The keywords for the search included ¡°nursing,¡± ¡°simulation,¡± ¡°instrument development,¡± ¡°evaluation,¡± ¡°validity,¡± and ¡°reliability.¡±

Results: A total of 16 studies and 17 evaluation instruments from between 2012 and 2022 were included and categorized. The participants included junior or senior undergraduate nursing students. The evaluation was conducted through observation and self-report and classified into cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. Only one instrument used for observation was measured for intra-rater reliability. Overall, 35.3% of the instruments integrally evaluated the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains, and 23.5% only reported one type of validity.

Conclusion: The results indicate that the instruments insufficiently reflect the various learning outcomes of simulation education. Therefore, future research should be conducted to develop simulation evaluation instruments to evaluate integral learning areas according to the learning goals and examine their validity.
KeyWords
°£È£±³À°, ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ±³À°, °íÂû, Çлý
Nursing education research, Simulation training, Review, Students
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)